The WNBA has seen an explosion of skill in recent years, with players like A’ja Wilson and Angel Reese showcasing historic performances. The league is on the rise, but coaching and development need to catch up to the level of talent. Many teams are still playing a conservative style of basketball that doesn’t fit the current trend of the game.
Double-big lineups are becoming outdated in the WNBA, not due to a lack of talent but because they contradict the current style of play. The 3-point revolution has changed the way basketball is played, making double-big lineups less effective.
Questions arise about the compatibility of post players in modern lineups. Can players like Reese and Kamilla Cardoso coexist without developing a perimeter skillset? Teams like the Mystics and Sparks face dilemmas when investing in non-shooting bigs. Redundancy becomes a concern when building a team.
Where do double-big lineups stand today?
Analysis of double-big lineups in the WNBA reveals the prevalence of using two bigs in lineups, but their effectiveness is questionable. Several teams rely on double-big lineups, but the trend may be shifting.
Las Vegas Aces: A’ja Wilson, Kiah Stokes
Los Angeles Sparks: Dearica Hamby, Cameron Brink
Dallas Wings: Teaira McCowan, Monique Billings
Washington Mystics: Stefanie Dolson, Aaliyah Edwards
Connecticut Sun: Brionna Jones, Alyssa Thomas
Indiana Fever: NaLyssa Smith, Aliyah Boston
Seattle Storm: Nneka Ogwumike, Ezi Magbegor
Chicago Sky: Angel Reese, Kamilla Cardoso
Atlanta Dream: Tina Charles, Cheyenne Parker
Three teams avoid using double-big lineups, showing a shift in the league’s playing style.
Even though many teams prefer double-big lineups, they may not be the most efficient. An analysis of key factors like shooting, turnovers, rebounding, and free throws reveals the limitations of double-big lineups.
The temptations of paint dominance
The efficiency of double-big lineups is hindered by a lack of shooting and spacing. Post players tend to clog the paint, affecting their team’s offensive efficiency.
…
