rewrite this title MLB Mailbag: Helsley, Giants, Rangers, Brewers, Gore, Cubs, Padres

This week’s MLBTR Mailbag looks at Ryan Helsley’s value, potential upgrades for the Giants, some Rangers trade candidates, the Brewers’ infield, MacKenzie Gore’s breakout and why he’s a difficult trade candidate to envision, the Cubs’ bench, the Padres’ outfield and more!

Let’s dive in!

Sam asks…

Given Helsley’s dip in performance this year, would the Cardinals get more future value/prospects by trading him or offering a QO? This questions assumes that the decision is made entirely on boosting the farm system, not with any considerations for this year’s team or the ’25 playoffs.

The assumption there is important, as I’m not at all convinced the Cardinals will trade Helsley given the manner in which they’ve trounced preseason expectations from just about everyone (myself one thousand percent included). From a pure look at future value, though, the more prudent move to gain future value is to trade him before July 31. Holding him makes further assumptions than the one you listed in this question; it assumes that Helsley will stay healthy and that he’ll pitch well enough to merit a qualifying offer at season’s end. Neither is a given.

Further, there’s no certainty that he’d sign a contract worth $50MM or more even if he rejects a qualifying offer. That’s the threshold needed to secure a compensatory pick after the first round of the draft. If Helsley signed for under $50MM, that comp pick would come between Competitive Balance Round B and the third round, some 40 picks later.

If Helsley is healthy and pitching well, there’s a good case for him to land that $50MM+, but we can’t assume he gets it. There have been instances in the past of relievers turning down a QO, seeking a massive payday, and lingering in free agency because their initial ask was too high and because teams had exhausted their offseason budgets by the time that asking price came down. Cardinals fans should be quite familiar with this phenomenon; it’s how Greg Holland landed in St. Louis back in 2018.

So, there’s a lot of presumption just to get to the point where the Cardinals select in the No. 31-35 range with the comp pick for Helsley — and then there’s the matter of actually drafting the correct player there as well. There are obvious, bigger-picture benefits to adding that pick’s slot value to the team’s 2026 draft budget, but the best way to maximize that value is to land a high-quality prospect there. Let’s run through the recent history of players selected with QO compensation picks after the first round: