Heroes With an Identity Crisis – DOTABUFF

Dota is an ever-evolving game and that is undeniably good. The current balance update drought might be a bit longer than we would like it to be, but even in the absence of updates, there are still new meta developments emerging here and there. Today, however, we are not going to talk about temporary trends and will instead concentrate on heroes who, in our opinion, lost parts of what made them unique.

They are not necessarily worse off and neither are they unviable. In fact, some of them are incredibly popular even at the highest level of play.

The topic we are raising is that they are popular not in a way their design presupposes. This is perfectly normal in Dota — after all, the more sandbox-y and freeform approach to player expression through their hero of choice is why Dota is infinitely more complex and deep, compared to most other games. So just to be clear: we do not consider it a problem, but we do feel like it is something that is interesting to talk about and worth discussing.

As a self-proclaimed Dazzle connoisseur, I feel like the hero started experiencing some issues with the Oracle release way back in the day. Oracle did the main thing Dazzle did, but better. And since then, the hero’s been kind of lost, getting a lot of reworks over the last decade.

Dazzle used to be the go to save support. His old ultimate, Weave used to create a massive Armor discrepancy between teams, making his rather tame healing capabilities matter that much more. After all — healing a target with 5 Armor is very different to healing a target with 30+.

He had decently short cooldowns, strong laning presence and high teamfight presence. All of this is somewhat true even now, but now he definitely needs gold to truly shine.

Hence the current trend of picking Dazzle in a core role. Between being Universal and some free instant attacks through Aghanim’s, Dazzle can be an incredibly powerful scaling damage dealer, even though the original design revolved around him being a save support.

The problem is, with how precise Dota’s balance has to be, heroes who are good at many different things are typically not that great at anything particular. And it is, indeed, the case with Dazzle: the hero is outclassed as a save support by many different heroes, and he is way too unreliable as a core. Hence, almost complete absence from the professional scene and higher level pubs.

The introduction of Facets should have alleviated some of the problems the hero is experiencing, but we are still waiting for a support Dazzle to make a true comeback and become part of the meta. Or maybe for him to finally become a proper core hero. Otherwise the hero just feels lost.

Invoker becoming Universal is just weird, right? He is the arsenal magus after all. A top of the line Wizard in the Dota Universe. He absolutely should be an Intelligence hero.

If we are talking lore and world-building consistency, Invoker is, maybe, similar to Vilgefortz and maybe arsenal magus being a powerful combatant who uses magic to amplify their physical prowess makes sense. Or maybe we could put him somewhere close to Biomancer Psykers from the Warhammer 40k Universe. They are kind of mages, but they fight like warriors through the use of their Warp “magic”. And lore-wise in the world of Dota Invoker being Universal can kind of make sense.

Right-clicking Invoker in a game of Dota still doesn’t. There is just something wrong with the hero building double Wraith Band and Manta Style, going around primarily auto-attacking people and scaling into a carry.

Perhaps I am wrong, or perhaps it is me being old, but I would love to see Invoker become an Intelligence hero once again. Maybe with some buffs to his spells and abilities, to compensate for the lack of overwhelming right-clicking potential.

On the opposite side of the coin we have Muerta — a hero with a built-in 50% chance to double-attack, with each attack having a chance to crit. A hero, who despite having one of the strongest auto-attack steroids in the game is primarily being played as a support.

This one is weird to us, to be honest. Maybe the problem is that the hero is Intelligence-based and there aren’t many Int-focused right-click DPS items. Maybe it is her lack of farming prowess — the hero has no mobility and is somewhat slow, when moving from camp to camp.

Maybe it is the hero’s squishiness, but the end result is still a character who definitely ended up being played in a way that is different from the designers’ intentions.

Now, much like with Invoker, we don’t think it is a balance issue or that it detracts from the quality of the game in any meaningful way. It just feels “wrong”, but it really isn’t, if we are thinking about the game as a whole.

That said, we would love to see those two heroes swap their primary attributes, so we could end up with a carry Muerta and a spellcasting Invoker. That would feel “right”.

What is your opinion on the subject? Do you think it doesn’t matter how the hero is utilized, as long as they are effective and can fill a niche in the game? Or are you more like me, who feels like there should be slightly more connection between hero’s lore and visual design, and their in-game role?

Share your thoughts and other examples of heroes who could use a lore-friendly balance update in the comment section below!